Comments on: Decreasing load times with RSLs http://ducharme.cc/decreasing-load-time-rsls/ father, francophile, former pro wrestler, improvisational comedian, coder and all around good guy ;) Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:01:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Deacon http://ducharme.cc/decreasing-load-time-rsls/comment-page-1/#comment-119 Deacon Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:27:19 +0000 http://ducharme.cc/?p=293#comment-119 First of all the flex framework is stored in the flash cache, so clearing out your cache often ( I have my browsers set up to clear the cache when I close the program ) does not clear the flex framework RSL. The flash cache needs to be cleared from the <a href="http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager03.html" rel="nofollow">Flash Player™ Settings Manager</a>. If you only have one app that uses very little of the framework, you still probably use quite a bit of the framework but I could see how using RSLs might seem like a waste of your time. You really have to compare the sizes between the separate files and a single file then think about how often people will <em>reuse</em> your app ( and any other app that uses the same flex framework RSLs ) then decide what makes the most sense for you. Now, if that is still to heavy you can make a pure actionscript project and use a separate GUI framework such as ASwing ( <a href="http://www.aswing.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aswing.org/</a> ). Then you wouldn't have to worry about as much overhead. Something like that might be better for a slideshow anyway ( depending on what you are trying to build ). If you are comfortable with actionscript then this is a great way to come up with something that doesn't look like a flex app. I hope some of that information helps you out. Thanks for the comment Joe. First of all the flex framework is stored in the flash cache, so clearing out your cache often ( I have my browsers set up to clear the cache when I close the program ) does not clear the flex framework RSL. The flash cache needs to be cleared from the Flash Player™ Settings Manager.
If you only have one app that uses very little of the framework, you still probably use quite a bit of the framework but I could see how using RSLs might seem like a waste of your time. You really have to compare the sizes between the separate files and a single file then think about how often people will reuse your app ( and any other app that uses the same flex framework RSLs ) then decide what makes the most sense for you.

Now, if that is still to heavy you can make a pure actionscript project and use a separate GUI framework such as ASwing ( http://www.aswing.org/ ). Then you wouldn’t have to worry about as much overhead. Something like that might be better for a slideshow anyway ( depending on what you are trying to build ). If you are comfortable with actionscript then this is a great way to come up with something that doesn’t look like a flex app.

I hope some of that information helps you out. Thanks for the comment Joe.

]]> By: Joe http://ducharme.cc/decreasing-load-time-rsls/comment-page-1/#comment-118 Joe Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:34:29 +0000 http://ducharme.cc/?p=293#comment-118 I would love to know if there is a way of making Flex streamlined like Flash. I decided to recreate a slideshow utility using Flex so that I had access to the much nicer and easier framework tools. Unfortunately, if the framework has not yet been cached, this means a file that was originally about 50k is now multiple files, adding up to about 2MB. Caching is all well and good, but no substitute for streamlined frameworks. I just wish I could take the bits I was using (mx:Tile, s:Group etc) and strip the rest. There are a lot of people out there like me who clear out their caches on a regular basis, and sitting there waiting for a plain slideshow to load when it originally sat in a tiny few K is pretty terrible. I would love to know if there is a way of making Flex streamlined like Flash. I decided to recreate a slideshow utility using Flex so that I had access to the much nicer and easier framework tools. Unfortunately, if the framework has not yet been cached, this means a file that was originally about 50k is now multiple files, adding up to about 2MB.

Caching is all well and good, but no substitute for streamlined frameworks. I just wish I could take the bits I was using (mx:Tile, s:Group etc) and strip the rest. There are a lot of people out there like me who clear out their caches on a regular basis, and sitting there waiting for a plain slideshow to load when it originally sat in a tiny few K is pretty terrible.

]]>