<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decreasing load times with RSLs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ducharme.cc/decreasing-load-time-rsls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ducharme.cc/decreasing-load-time-rsls/</link>
	<description>father, francophile, former pro wrestler, improvisational comedian, coder and all around good guy ;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 06:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: each day</title>
		<link>http://ducharme.cc/decreasing-load-time-rsls/comment-page-1/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>each day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducharme.cc/?p=293#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>I wanted to thank you a lot more for your amazing web page you have designed here. It is full of useful tips for those who are truly interested in this kind of subject, in particular this very post. You really are all so sweet in addition to thoughtful of others plus reading your website posts is a superb delight in my opinion. And that of a generous reward! Jeff and I will have pleasure making use of your suggestions in what we have to do in the near future. Our list is a mile long which means your tips might be put to great use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to thank you a lot more for your amazing web page you have designed here. It is full of useful tips for those who are truly interested in this kind of subject, in particular this very post. You really are all so sweet in addition to thoughtful of others plus reading your website posts is a superb delight in my opinion. And that of a generous reward! Jeff and I will have pleasure making use of your suggestions in what we have to do in the near future. Our list is a mile long which means your tips might be put to great use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deacon</title>
		<link>http://ducharme.cc/decreasing-load-time-rsls/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Deacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducharme.cc/?p=293#comment-119</guid>
		<description>First of all the flex framework is stored in the flash cache, so clearing out your cache often ( I have my browsers set up to clear the cache when I close the program ) does not clear the flex framework RSL. The flash cache needs to be cleared from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager03.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Flash Player&#8482; Settings Manager&lt;/a&gt;.
If you only have one app that uses very little of the framework, you still probably use quite a bit of the framework but I could see how using RSLs might seem like a waste of your time. You really have to compare the sizes between the separate files and a single file then think about how often people will &lt;em&gt;reuse&lt;/em&gt; your app ( and any other app that uses the same flex framework RSLs ) then decide what makes the most sense for you.

Now, if that is still to heavy you can make a pure actionscript project and use a separate GUI framework such as ASwing ( &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aswing.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.aswing.org/&lt;/a&gt; ). Then you wouldn&#039;t have to worry about as much overhead. Something like that might be better for a slideshow anyway ( depending on what you are trying to build ). If you are comfortable with actionscript then this is a great way to come up with something that doesn&#039;t look like a flex app.

I hope some of that information helps you out. Thanks for the comment Joe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all the flex framework is stored in the flash cache, so clearing out your cache often ( I have my browsers set up to clear the cache when I close the program ) does not clear the flex framework RSL. The flash cache needs to be cleared from the <a href="http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager03.html" rel="nofollow">Flash Player&trade; Settings Manager</a>.<br />
If you only have one app that uses very little of the framework, you still probably use quite a bit of the framework but I could see how using RSLs might seem like a waste of your time. You really have to compare the sizes between the separate files and a single file then think about how often people will <em>reuse</em> your app ( and any other app that uses the same flex framework RSLs ) then decide what makes the most sense for you.</p>
<p>Now, if that is still to heavy you can make a pure actionscript project and use a separate GUI framework such as ASwing ( <a href="http://www.aswing.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aswing.org/</a> ). Then you wouldn&#8217;t have to worry about as much overhead. Something like that might be better for a slideshow anyway ( depending on what you are trying to build ). If you are comfortable with actionscript then this is a great way to come up with something that doesn&#8217;t look like a flex app.</p>
<p>I hope some of that information helps you out. Thanks for the comment Joe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://ducharme.cc/decreasing-load-time-rsls/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducharme.cc/?p=293#comment-118</guid>
		<description>I would love to know if there is a way of making Flex streamlined like Flash. I decided to recreate a slideshow utility using Flex so that I had access to the much nicer and easier framework tools. Unfortunately, if the framework has not yet been cached, this means a file that was originally about 50k is now multiple files, adding up to about 2MB.

Caching is all well and good, but no substitute for streamlined frameworks. I just wish I could take the bits I was using (mx:Tile, s:Group etc) and strip the rest. There are a lot of people out there like me who clear out their caches on a regular basis, and sitting there waiting for a plain slideshow to load when it originally sat in a tiny few K is pretty terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to know if there is a way of making Flex streamlined like Flash. I decided to recreate a slideshow utility using Flex so that I had access to the much nicer and easier framework tools. Unfortunately, if the framework has not yet been cached, this means a file that was originally about 50k is now multiple files, adding up to about 2MB.</p>
<p>Caching is all well and good, but no substitute for streamlined frameworks. I just wish I could take the bits I was using (mx:Tile, s:Group etc) and strip the rest. There are a lot of people out there like me who clear out their caches on a regular basis, and sitting there waiting for a plain slideshow to load when it originally sat in a tiny few K is pretty terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

